But on with the work:
Monday's reading for all three sections of WAR II is the same: pages 162-181 of DPC. The only question that you should be considering, and responding to in your journal, is the following: "What are your personal definitions of a scholarly pursuit and a scholarly insight, and define/explain what makes a text worthy enough to pull meaning from?"
On the Critical Encounters "Human Interaction" creative non-fiction piece:
The copy I will grade/respond to is due at the beginning of class on Monday.
To remind you on the prompt: "Write about a personal interaction you've had with either "an environment" or with a person/group of people; an interaction that then lead to some personal knowledge on human nature."
These pieces are allowed to be super-creative. Write them with the intention of both engaging the experience, but also try to make the read enjoyable for your audience.
- use your own metaphors
-write from specific personal experiences. Replay what happened, not just the meaning, but the action.
- use stronger verbs / get rid of stale language
- just write about experience; try to rid language of preface material.
- in other words, don't write it like a science report . . . unless you want to structure it as such for entertainment value!
- take a risk in your viewpoint or language, or both. I've already heard some beautiful responses.
No comments:
Post a Comment